Anyone remember that crazy time toward the end of 2008 when all of our portfolios fell apart?Â Through a clever combination of whiskey and denial, most of us have managed to effectively neutralÂize any memory of the actual happenings of the crash.Â All we know is that we landed somewhere unÂpleasant and the banks are somehow completely to blame.
Well, if youâ€™ll recall, one of the big events that happened back then was that Fed Chairman Ben BerÂnanke swooped in on his mighty steed and said, â€œHey AIG: in order to ease your burden here, Iâ€™ll make the taxpayers buy all your faulty and most likely worthless assets so you can go back to frolickÂing around the globe insuring whatever it is you people insure.â€
And at AIG there was much rejoicing.Â Yaaaaaaaay.
However, on Main Street (a clever way of saying EVERYWHERE else other than Wall Street), there was not much rejoicing.Â Itâ€™s like we just paid top dollar for steaming piles ofâ€¦ use your imagination.
Back in the day, this kind of thing would have been dealt with by throwing Big Ben into the river.Â If he floated, than he was a witch and should be burned at the stake.Â And if he sank, well, then we probaÂbly shouldnâ€™t have drowned him.Â Oops.Â Â
â€œHow could our mighty leader lead us into such a poor deal?â€ we asked.Â Well, turns out that weâ€™re most likely going to profit from that deal.Â Yeah.Â The asset values came back.Â Huh.Â Didnâ€™t see that coming.Â I mention this story now because Obama just got done expounding the proposed rules that were going to be applied to banks that are deemed â€™too big to failâ€™ in order to reduce their risk-taking.
Do I think itâ€™s a good idea or a bad idea?Â I dunno.Â But neither do you OR the talking heads on our favorite news networks.Â Itâ€™s history being made.Â Are we going to swing from a period of gross under-regulation to a time of potential over-regulation?Â Probably.Â History would tell us that these patterns tend to repeat themselves.Â Â But regardless, the powers that be are doing what they feel is best for their constituency.Â Weâ€™ll just have to watch and see where the chips fall.
In mortgage news, the Federal Housing Administration (FHA) just had a press release itemizing some proposed changes to their lending practices.Â The big three to watch out for:
Â 1)Â Stricter credit requirements
Â 2)Â The maximum allowable seller contribution towards closing costs will be reduced from 6% to 3%
Â 3)Â The Upfront Mortgage Insurance Premium (UFMIP) cost will go up from 1.75% to 2.25%
So as not to belabor the point, UFMIP is essentially a closing cost required on all FHA loans that can be financed in.Â Bottom line: the loan is getting more expensive.Â The credit tightening and reduction in seller contribution is because the banks do not want to expose themselves to writing any more bad loans.Â This means that a prospective buyer will have to have higher credit scores and will have to come up with more money at closing to buy a home.Â
Consider yourselves warned.Â Right now we are experiencing the time weâ€™ll soon refer to as the â€˜Good Olâ€™ Daysâ€™.Â Enjoy them while they last.